Old School BMX freestyle, art and creative stuff, the future and economics, and anything else I find interesting...
Monday, October 21, 2024
Brian Yeagle street/dirt segment from Anthem II
Thursday, May 9, 2024
The Huntington Beach Pier Bank sessions of 1989
Saturday, April 22, 2023
Santee 1988: A day that changed bike riding forever...
Tuesday, December 27, 2022
New and incredible Gary Young edit
Christmas is over and "Ho, ho, holy shit there's some crazy lines in this video." Just watch it. It's not like you're working at work this week, anyhow.
Thursday, October 13, 2022
My NEW new blog- The Spot Finder
Monday, November 29, 2021
Sebastian Keep- More Walls PRO GRESS SHUN!
This one just came out, and if you're ever been into BMX, you've probably seen it. It's worth watching again. This is true BMX stunt work on street. Taking one basic trick, wallrides, and just pushing it in multiple directions past the current limits. Insane progression by Sebastian Keep. Another epic Red Bull backed video. Nobody does content creation like Red Bull.
Dakota Roche "Native Land" (BMX) edit
I just realized this is a year old, I thought it was more recent. This is my favorite Dakota Roche edit, when I want to watch some new school street. Back in about 2002, Cory Nastazio had a jam, up in Gorman, and most of the people had dinner at a good burger spot afterwards. The woman who helped put on the event was there, with her son. The kid was pretty skinny, and talking to all the pro riders saying, "I'm gonna go pro like you guys some day." The riders were all cool and encouraging. That kid was Dakota Roche. I ran into him two or three times after that, riding better each time. I remember him an a couple guys showing up at the Westminster Skatepark once, while I was riding there. He's freakin' a beast on street now. Love seeing his parts, but this one is my favorite.
Friday, March 6, 2020
Van's Shimmer- Big & Burly New School street ridnig
This video is from last summer, but I've never seen it, until today. Stumbled across it, and it's chock full of some big, burly modern street riding. It's from Van's, and is well shot and produced, though it repeats shots a lot, which is typical these days. It'd be really cool to seem some of these riders go freewheel or change up the set-up a bit, and invent some new tricks. But burly street riding is always a good watch.
Saturday, February 15, 2020
The Legend of the Jinx Bank
As usual in my BMX posts, I'm going back 34 years into the foggy memory banks, but here's how I remember it happening. If you have read very many of my BMX posts in my assorted blogs, you know my 1985-86 zine, San Jose Stylin', landed me a job at Wizard Publications in August of 1986. Officially, I was the sole editorial assistant, so I was an assistant to Craig "Gork" Barrette, editor of BMX Action, and Andy Jenkins and Mark "Lew" Lewman, the guys writing FREESTYLIN' magazine. Unofficially, I took over for Don Toshach, who actually had an English degree, and was the proofreader for both magazines. I was also the official driver of photographer Windy Osborn, driving her to many of the photo shoots, and being her assistant on those,. I went from a NorCal freesytler, making 57 pizzas in 4 hours at Pizza Hut, to working at THE MAGAZINES (!!!!) in one day. Huge life change, and I flew to L.A. with my bike (Skyway T/A), a suitcase, and $80. That move change the entire course of my life.
I wound up roommates with Gork and Lew, in Redondo Beach, 3-4 miles from the Wizard offices. We worked more-or-less 9 to 5ish, and put in extra hours near the magazine deadlines. On Saturdays and Sundays, if there wasn't a local contest somewhere, we all did our own thing, mostly. My weekends started with waking up, making a HUGE plate of about 12-15 small pancakes, and chowing those down while watching Lew's VHS copy of Bones Brigade II: Future Primitive. In the intro of that video is this great sentence by C.R. Stecyk:
Every Saturday and every Sunday, I'd carbo load on pancakes, watch Bones II, then grab my bike, and head out on an all day "scouting mission," as I called them. I'd just go exploring my new world on my bike, Redondo Beach, and the South Bay area of Southern California. Street riding was something we all did then, but it was in its infancy as a "thing" that actually had a name. Street skating, pioneered by then Vision skater Mark Gonzales, Curb Dog/Bones Brigade skater Tommy Guerrero, and Natas Kaupas, was just a year and a half old. Those guys were just beginning to explore the urban world as one big skatepark, waiting to be sessioned. Us BMX freestylers, and particularly Andy J. and Lew at FREESTYLIN', were heavily influenced by those early street skaters.
My favorite part of Bones II was (and still is) Tommy Guerrero's section, right at the beginning. I'd seen Tommy jump launch ramps in Golden Gate Park, and even shot photos of him for my zine, and he blew my mind with how high he launched off jump ramps, and his style, along with the other NorCal street skaters. I never really got to know him, but his use of the insane San Francisco terrain for skating made me want to go find cool shit around Redondo, and then session it on my bike. So that's what I did, weekend after weekend. I'd head off in one direction, usually to a known street spot to start, and then I'd wander in some area I'd never been to, and ride down alleys, behind shopping centers, and into weird little nooks and crannies, looking for cool stuff to ride.
One day, driving Windy and Ron Wilkerson to a photo shoot, at a quarterpipe behind a bike shop, on PCH in Redondo, we went 2 or 3 blocks too far, and so we rolled back two or three blocks down this alley, up the hill from Pacific Coast Highway. It was the photo shoot for some weird new Wilkerson trick, called the abubaca. we didn't know what that was, Ron had invented it on tour. Windy and Ron were talking as I drove the Wizard Astro van down the alley. Off to one side, I saw this weird, but awesome, bank next to a wall, in a little parking lot. My rider mind made a mental note, and I then drove on and found the quarterpipe we were looking for.
Two or three weeks later, as I headed out after my pancakes and Bones II, that bank popped into my head. So I headed up to PCH, and headed south. It wound up being a few blocks past where I thought it was. I was kind of lost, and came from a totally different direction, when I first saw it in the van. It took an hour or so, but I found the bank.
I'd never seen one like it, and I'd never heard Gork or Lew mention it, and they rode that area all the time. I went up a hill from PCH, behind this building, to the back parking lot. From that side street, the parking lot went down fairly steeply. The asphalt bank started as flat, and gradually got taller as the parking lot dropped down. At the high end, it was 5 to 6 feet high. I did a couple carves and kickturns on it, and scoped out the transition. It wasn't too kinked, and rode pretty well. This probably happened in September 1986, somewhere around there.
To put things in perspective, wall rides on bikes didn't exist yet... officially. On a photo shoot with Windy in Huntington Beach, I saw English bloke Dave Curry do a tiny wall ride. More of a wall bounce/slide. It blew my mind. But he was popping off a tiny, one foot high bank, and slapping both tires against the wall about a foot up. At the time it was amazing, but Windy didn't think it was worth a photo that day, and it was getting late, anyway. So Dave Curry didn't get the first wall ride photo in a magazine, which ultimately, is probably a good thing. Nothing against Dave, but I'll get to that in a bit.
At that time, in 1986, I was big on doing footplants when street riding. I would bunnyhop and footplant on ledges, benches, and wherever. I got that idea from both Dave Vanderspek and the Curb Dogs, and from Eddie Roman, another Skyway rider. So I started doing footplants, riding up the big end of this new bank, bunnyhopping, and planting my right foot on the wall. There was a business in that building, like paint store, or electric supply store, something like that. But they never came out and yelled at me as I bounced on their wall. So I kept riding.
Within half an hour, I was hitting the tallest part of the bank, around fivefeet high, and doing a footplant on the wall two or three feet above that. That bank was made for those. I was having a blast. That is, until I landed hard, and snapped my cheap ass, one piece cranks. I think that was the only time I ever snapped a pair of cranks.
So that ended my session, and I had to "scooter" my bike back to the apartment, more than a mile, dropcrank, pushing with the other foot. When I got back to the pad, Lew asked what happened. I told him I found this amazing bank to ride, was doing huge wall footplants, and snapped my crank. Lew went through all the banks he knew in the area, but this new bank was one he had never seen. So I told him I'd have to take him there sometime.
The next Monday, I found a pair of used cranks in a box in the rafters at Wizard, and I was back in action. The next weekend, I was back at the new bank, doing big footplants, kickturns, little bunnyhop bank "airs," and having more fun, another solo session. I came down hard from a footplant, and I cracked my fork dropout. It started to clink and wobble, and I didn't want my front wheel to fall off. I had that happen once, and it's not a good thing. So I headed back to the homestead. The next Monday, I found an old pair of Randy Tischman's forks up in the rafters, purple Kuwahara ones, I think, with weird little stands on the top of the curves. I put them on, and was ready to ride again.
It took a couple of weeks, but I finally got Lew to follow me to this new bank one Saturday. He did a few kickturns or something, to get the feel of the bank. I started doing my footplants, and Lew said they looked way gnarlier than what he had imagined when I described them. Lew started trying footplants, or something, and got sketchy on one landing, crashed, and rolled his ankle. It was a mild, but painful, sprain. That ended our session. As we started heading slowly home, Lew was pedaling gingerly on his sore ankle. He said something like, "First you snapped your cranks, then your forks, now I sprained my ankle, this bank is jinxed." And that's how the Jinx Bank got its name.
The next Monday at work, Lew actually told everyone how gnarly my footplants were, and said Windy should shoot photos of me there. I was stoked, because I was absolutely desperate to get a photo of me riding in the FREESTYLIN'. But Lew was known for exaggeration, which Andy called "The Lew Factor." Andy J. said, "Lew says these footplants are really gnarly, but when we add in The Lew Factor, that makes them kind of gnarly." One of these days we'll get Windy to check them out, but no photo shoot right now. We never made it back out there for Windy to see them. And Lew never went back to ride the Jinx Bank, it did its number on his psyche. Myself, I went back every couple of weeks, and took Craig Grasso there often. Grasso and I had many more great sessions at the Jinx Bank, and neither of us broke bike parts or body parts. No more Jinxes from the Jinx Bank, after it had been named. We told R.L. Osborn about it once, and he had actually been there years earlier, after hearing about it from some skaters. But he never went back.
I got laid off from Wizard at the end of December 1986, and never got a photo of me riding the Jinx Bank. I did make it back up there for 3 or 4 more sessions, over the next few years. The last time I went, the building owners had made the small asphalt curb at the bottom, making it hard to ride and skate, without some plywood to lay over the curb. You can see that in Brian's video above.
Later they added the weird wood thing on the wall, which you can also see in Brian's video above. That made it largely session proof, for either bikes or skates. But the coolest thing about the Jinx Bank for me was that when I left, Gork and Lew knew it was there. Because of that, about nine months later, this photo of Eddie Roman, doing the first wall ride ever in a magazine(since Dave Curry missed his shot) was taken, by Windy, at the Jinx Bank. It's one of those epic Windy Osborn photos. This photo changed bike riding instantly, and forever. With that one photo, suddenly wall rides were possible, and walls, especially banks to walls, were in play.
While I never got a photo there, and was never a great rider, my Tommy Guerrero and pancake fueled solo scouting missions found the Jinx Bank, a spot that later changed BMX freestyle history. Not much, but I was stoked the first wall ride photo happened there. A while after that, Craig Campbell also got an epic wall ride photo there, as Brian shows in the video above.
Street riding progressed rapidly over the next several years, and turned into its own genre eventually, as we all know. Craig Grasso added his flavor to street, many times over the years. Here he is on another local bank, a favorite photo of mine.
I may not have had a riding photo in FREESTYLIN', but in BMX DIY fashion, I gave myself a quick, but decent, wall ride clip in my 1990 self-produced video, The Ultimate Weekend. And a stylized version of this sketchy video still below is on the T-shirt I'm wearing right now, 34 years after rediscovering the Jinx Bank. Wall ride over my sister Cheri's head, Blues Brothers Wall, Huntington Beach, 1990. May the "minds of 12-year-olds" in all of us never stop discovering cool shit to ride in our urban environment.
Monday, August 19, 2019
The Problems With Subjective Judging
Dennis McCoy shralping in pro flatland in New York in 1986. At one of the velodrome contests that year, I thought Dennis, who had the freshest, new style in pro flatland at the time, should have beat Woody Itson, the veteran icon of the day. I wrote that in my zine. It was my honest opinion at the time. Dennis, of course, was stoked when he saw the zine, and Woody was a bit bummed. Both of them rode great at that contest, and, like always, it came down to a subjective call by the five judges. Were Woody's well known tricks, executed flawlessly, better than McCoy's new style and flair and energy? No matter what the call, someone always gets pissed off.
When I got into BMX racing in 1982, it was usually easy to see who won. It was a race, after all, first guy (or girl) across the line was the winner. But even at the local BMX track there were issues. It had become a custom to stop pedaling about 30 feet before the finish line, and coast over the last little set of doubles and the finish line just beyond. No one even tried to actually race the last 30 feet. It was kind of like a gentleman's agreement, your place coming out of the third turn at the Fort Boise track was your place in the race, forget racing the last straight. I think it was much the same at other tracks, and at the national level, as well.
Us kids from Blue Valley trailer park, brand new to BMX racing, hungry to win a trophy in anything, decided to pedal to the finish, and pass the points chasers who were coasting. Then people got mad when we said, "Hey, I beat those two guys who were coasting." So even in the black and white world of a race with a distinct finish line, there were sometimes issues. For a couple of races, we made the lazy kids pedal those last 30 feet. Other riders gave us crap, then we eventually stopped pedaling at the end, and we too, and joined the program.
But when BMX freestyle came along, and it was a brand new sport in 1984, we all soon learned the problems of subjective judging. Subjective judging is simply anytime that a group of judges judge an event, score the contestants based on their person opinion of the performance, and the winner is the person with the highest total score. There's no absolute winner by objective facts, like being the first over the finish line. With subjective judging, you have a few personal opinions that find the winner. And personal opinions can be affected in a whole bunch of ways, as we all soon learned.
This was one of the reasons that pro freestyler R.L. Osborn, and a few others, at first, didn't like the idea of even having BMX freestyle competitions. It's hard to believe now, but for maybe a year, that was actually an issue. Up until then, flatland and quarterpipe riding had been a demonstration sport. Riders performed in shows, and people clapped and cheered, or they didn't. But eventually competitions were accepted as a necessary, if kind of annoying, part of freestyle.
Since a flatland or ramp routine was a performance, like music or dance or figure skating in that respect, that meant a group of people had to judge the performance, and score each contestant against the others, and the high overall score would win. This opened up several cans of worms, and suddenly half of the riders, or more, were mad at the judges at the end of the day at every contest. Ultimately, over the course of those first 3 or 4 big years of AFA contests, we all learned the basic truth of subjective judging.
One of the first issues was, who do we get to judge? Since BMX freestyle was a new sport, there were no old pros, who had ridden for years, to judge. So industry guys, usually former BMX racers, originally judged freestyle pros, and the current freestyle pros were tapped to judge the amateurs. This didn't work too well, though it seemed to make sense at the time.
It turned out that veteran racers, while great BMX riders, didn't know the nuances of the ever evolving world of freestyle tricks. Having never done most of the tricks, they just didn't know which tricks looked hard, and which tricks were hard. At the same time, when the sport was so new, there might be 40 different riders, at every contest, doing tricks that were completely new. Those were tricks that no one had seen before, outside of that rider's group of friends. So no one knew if the tricks were actually hard. Some easy tricks look great, like Dennis McCoy's fancy footwork back then. It looked amazing, but wasn't really hard at all. I'm not dissing Dennis, he did plenty of really hard moves, but the footwork that blew people's minds at first, was flashy, but technically not that difficult.
Another issue was that pro freestylers made lousy judges, by and large. Judging a freestyle contest (or any event with lots of participants), takes concentration, among other things. We soon found that the last thing pro riders wanted to do at a big competition was to watch dozens of younger, mediocre riders, and try to place their routines in the precise order of who was better than who. Pros wanted to hang out, talk to old friends, meet girls, and have fun. They didn't want to watch goofy kids from Idaho balance on their bike and juggle tennis balls. That was what I did my first contest, by the away. Nothing blows your concentration like starting your first routine at a major contest and having the announcer say, "And here's Steve Emig, from Boise, Idaho, with his balls in his hands."
In time, and especially as competitions grew, and the AFA had to deal with huge groups of 50 or more riders in a single class, we learned that parents of riders made the best judges. The parents were less distracted, they were older, more mature (usually) and they were much better at concentrating and trying to fairly judge a large group of riders, many of whom were very close in talent level. From a purely functional level, the parents that volunteered at contests made good judges.
Having parents judge the large amateur classes, of course, led to the most obvious problem with judging, bias towards, or against, certain riders. If a parent was judging their own kid in a contest, everyone expected them to judge their kid above the other riders. That did happen on occasion, and the AFA tried to get other judges to fill in for the classes when a judge's kid was riding. With a limited number of parents to judge, and lots of riders, that wasn't always possible.
There were other issues with parent's judging. As hard as it is to believe, sometimes a rider's parent would judge their own kid harder, just to make sure that everyone thought they were being fair. Then the kid actually placed lower. It didn't happen often, but it actually did happen. Another issue with parents judging contests is that they don't know all the tricks, especially the new ones, which leads to new tricks getting judged at lower scores than older, better known tricks. Another issue with parents judging was that the tricks they were most familiar with were the tricks their kids did, or were working on. So if Timmy was good at boomerangs and decades, but never did tailwhips, then boomerangs and decades got judged higher, usually without the parent doing it intentionally. Another weird aspect of parents judging their kids is that sometimes they would judge their own kid on how good they usually did the trick, not how they actually performed it in the contest. At times, and again this was largely unintentional, a parent would watch their kid ride and think, "Bill dabbed his foot on that decade, but usually he can pull it every time," so they wouldn't count it against them.
All of those things were issues we had with parents judging at those AFA local and AFA Masters contests in the mid to late 1980's. While their were issues, mostly the parents did a better job judging than anyone else would have. I know. I worked for the AFA in 1987, and I got stuck judging a few classes at the big Masters comps. Seriously, watching 50 kids, especially like 14-15 novice or intermediate flatland, just plain sucked. I tried to be fair, like all the judges, but most of the kids were boring as fuck to watch, and it was easy to get distracted for a few seconds, and miss that one good trick they did. Then, trying to get the 30 middle riders in a reasonably correct order, though they all were pretty much the same, was pretty much impossible. To make it even worse, we judged knowing at least 5 or 10 kids would be bitching at us the rest of the weekend because they got 27th in 14-15 intermediate, and they thought they were better than the kid who got 14th. We just wanted to scream sometimes, "Go practice more so you'll stand out, kid!"
Another issue was just the dynamics of actually judging. What score do you give the first kid? If he's awesome, do you give him a 98? What if three more guys are better later on? We soon took to giving the very first rider a 75, which gave us room to judge both up and down from there. If the first kid was really good, then most of the riders would score below 75. If the kid sucked, most of the other riders would score above 75. Then kids in one class would say to their friends, "Hey, I got an 82 and you got a 72 in your class, so I'm better than you. But the scores didn't transfer from class to class. Also, the riders that rode last pretty much always scored better. It just always worked out that way, even though we tried to score fairly. But it was impossible to explain that to kids. So those were some of the issues we dealt with for the masses of riders in the amateur classes. No matter what, some kids were always mad, that's just the nature of subjective judging. The top few riders always stood out, but even getting them in the correct order was still hard.
Judging the pro classes was a different story, for several reasons. First of all, there was money on the line. OK, it was the AFA in the late 80's, the first wave of BMX freestyle popularity, and there wasn't much money. But a little change in judging could mean a couple of places, and several hundred dollars more or less in prize money. Another thing was that the pros, mostly, were all pretty close in riding skills (Fred Blood excepted, of course ; ) ), and so the judging was always tighter. Then there were titles on the line, winning the contest looked a lot better to the rider's sponsors than getting third. The pros also did harder tricks, and had different styles, so the judges were often judging one rider's style against another. That was the issue at the Velodrome contest where Woody Itson beat newcomer Dennis McCoy, but I thought Dennis should have won. Was Dennis' style and showmanship really better than Woody's classic, known to be hard, tricks. Flip a coin, on any given day it could go either way. Because the class had far fewer people, we often had either pro flatlanders judge the ramp riders, and vice versa, or top amateurs judge the pros. That worked pretty well. It's much easier to pay close attention to 8 pro riders than to 50 novices.
Then we finally get to the issue most people think about with subjective judging, personal bias. Did that amateur rider from Hutch score Mike Dominguez higher than Eddie Fiola because Mike rode for Hutch? Did someone pay a certain judge to throw the contest? Did someone score a pro higher because they were a fan of that pro years earlier, when they were just getting into riding? Did a rider get scored higher because their style was just the trendy style at the time, and there were, and still are always trendy styles. Did the technical rider doing harder tricks score higher than the rider doing less hard tricks, but with more style? That was the classic issue in skateboarding at the time, with Tony Hawk's tech tricks versus Christian Hosoi's high air and style. Did a certain rider have an off day, but still score high just because of their name recognition? All of these things happened at some level. Overall, most of the judges, most of the time, tried to do the best job they could. But there were problems.
And that's my whole point with subjective judging. IT'S NEVER FAIR. Period. Sometimes you get screwed as a competitor. Sometimes things worked in your favor. Over the long run, the best riders score well on a consistent basis. But it's never fair, whether it's a local contest with five kids, or it's figure skating in the Olympics. And the more that is at stake, the harder it is to judge accurately, the more likely it is to be contested, and the more pissed off someone will be.
This is my big problem with BMX freestyle and skateboarding being in the Olympics. Those huge, once every 4 years, contests are about "crowning champions." Those champions are then used in all kinds of money making and sponsorship ventures and commercials. The drive to rig the system is incredibly high, because there can literally be millions of dollars at stake. And as freestylers, and I was a hardcore, if not great freestyler, for 20 years, we know that one placing at one contest really doesn't mean all that much. It's nice. But it doesn't make you the "best rider ever." It doesn't make you the most progressive rider, or the most influential rider. Winning one contest, ANY CONTEST, doesn't make you THE CHAMPION. That's kind of the whole point of action sports. Lots of different styles, lots of different riders, and no one's really the best ever, until you get to a long term innovator like a Mat Hoffman or Kevin Jones.
Winning at any major contest means that a certain group of judges, who may or may not have tried to do a legit job, who all had their personal biases, judged you to be the best, on that day, in that location, at that time. You won the day. Maybe you deserved it, maybe you didn't. And that's just the way it goes with subjective judging. Again, it's never completely fair. So should you make $3 million for getting on the Wheaties box and in the TV commercials, and the rider who came in second on that day be completely forgotten? Most of us who've put time into learning an action sport at some point say, "No." But that's how it goes with the Olympics, or even the X-Games.
One more thought. Subjective judging seriously stifles creativity and innovation. Ever see a figure skater do a SWITCH triple Lutz? No. Never. You haven't. Do you know why? Because there is no pre-figured out score for doing anything switch, or opposite direction, in figure skating. Yes, it would be much harder, but they don't do it, because they wouldn't get scored for it if they did.
Figure skating has been a competitive, subjectively judged sport for at least 160 years. The origins of the sport go back to at least 1772. But no one does the high level tricks in the opposite direction in the Olympics. In skateboarding and BMX freestyle, people started doing switch tricks in the late 1980's, only a few years into BMX freestyle or street skating competitions. In a few years those sports evolved more than figure skating did in 160 years. Why? Because riders and skaters progress naturally, organically, and without certain number scores being given to particular tricks. The creativity in figure skating (or gymnastics, or any older judged sport), has been dramatically reduced to turn it into a sport. The same is true of BMX vert, park, and street today. Imagine a top rider in a comp today doing a major contest routine WITHOUT a single flip, barspin, or tailwhip. Boom, they're not even in contention for a top placing, no matter what they do. Does that mean the riders who don't do those tricks are worse riders? Think of a run by Brian Foster, Chris Doyle, or Gary Young. Oh, those guys are/were as good as the top contest riders, and they can blow your mind in a contest setting, without the "standard" tricks. But they're not going to win a contest in nearly any case, because they don't do the current trendy tricks like 25 barspins, tailwhips, and flip tricks.
I'm not against contests in actions sports, they provide a good reason to push harder, to progress in some areas of riding (but not necessarily creativity except for best trick comps), and to travel different places, which gives riders and excuse to ride with new people. But it would be really cool to simply acknowledge BMX freestyle (or flatland, park, street, vert, whatever) contests, with subjective judging, for what they do. They tell you that on this day, in this place, this group of judges thought this person was the best. That doesn't make that person the best ever, it makes them a really good rider who won that day.
I know that's a lot to ask. But a few of us got into a big Facebook discussion on this the other day, starting with the question of whether BMX freestyle (park, street, and maybe vert) should be in the Olympics. I say they should not be in the Olympics. Anyhow, that online discussion gave me the idea to write down some of my ideas about subjective judging, and it's role in action sports, and other sports, in today's world. If you have comments, let them fly in the Facebook groups, or wherever. I'll read them, and reply when needed.
Monday, June 10, 2019
The Bummyhop
Often after a few hours of riding at Golden Gate Park, a bunch of us would head to the Embarcadero to ride. That was a spot in downtown S.F., with big concrete ledges and other cool stuff to ride. At that point, in 1985-86, street riding was about bunnyhopping up, or jumping off things, doing footplants, launching off curb jumps, and things like that. Wall rides and ped grinds on street hadn't been invented yet. At some point, while riding the Embarcadero with Dave Vanderspek, Maurice Meyer, and others from the Golden Gate Park crew, someone mentioned the term vollie. When I asked what that was, they explained that it was an ollie over any homeless person, usually one laying down, or maybe over their legs while sitting. A "vollie" was the San Francisco skateboarder term for a "vagrant ollie," ollying over a homeless person.
As an inquisitive dork, and the zine guy of the scene, I asked what a BMX bunnyhop over a homeless person was called. I got about five different answers. I realized that there was no actual, "official" term for bunnyhopping over a bum. WE did actually do that once in a while, usually when Vander and Drob would head off through the streets, and we'd follow them, hopping over or footplanting any obstacle we found.
Being the zine guy of NorCal, I decided this issue needed a resolution, so I took a poll among all the Golden Gate Park riders, to get their ideas. Out of the 5 or 6 initial ideas, two terms led the pack, vunnyhop, for vagrant bunnyhop, or bummyhop, a bunnyhop over a bum. There was some serious discussion (well, sort of serious), and a bit of arguing. The poll was close. But in the end, the term "bummyhop" was officially sanctioned as the term for bunnyhopping over a homeless person in an urban setting. I put the results in my zine, and we all got a laugh out of it.
Now, as a person who has been homeless for extended periods, one just ending a month ago, I'd like to say that it's really lame to harass homeless people, they have more than enough to worry about, and get shit from all kinds of people all the time. Homelessness is also an industry, and several groups and many people make a living off the homelessness industry. And that sucks. That's why I avoided nearly all non-profits and programs for homeless people.
But as a longtime BMX rider, if there's a bum crashed out on the sidewalk, and you're in a hurry, and can do it safely, bunnyhop the fucker. I've done a few bummyhops in my time. Looking for a good, old school video of someone bunnyhopping a bunch of people just now, like maybe Mike Buff's 15 person bunnyhops back in the day, I ran into a video of a news clip of some kids in L.A. getting in trouble for bummyhopping homeless guys and putting the videos on YouTube.
I'm an old BMXer, I've done this in San Francisco, 30-some years ago, but not for video or photos. I think the people in the video that I found, acting all uptight, are pretty hypocritical. I doubt they think twice about the homeless normally, until a camera was thrust in their face, and someone showed them a bummyhop video and asked their opinion. They said it was terrible.
Here's my thoughts, if you're out shooting video, and you want to bunnyhop a homeless person and shoot video of it, talk to them first. Stage it, let them know what you want to do, and show them you have the skills to do it without injuring the person. Then, after you shoot your footage, hook the person or people up for helping you get some cool footage. Give them $5 or $10, buy them a pizza, a beer, or some cigarettes. If you're really cool, give them money to get a cheap motel room for the night. Whatever. Make it worth the homeless person's while. Then shoot some bonus footage showing that you set it up, and the people were cool with it. You'll probably get some cool interview footage, as well, homeless people make for great interviews.
But do not go around looking for passed out homeless people, and bunnyhopping them just for your video. Obviously, you could seriously injure someone, if they sit up suddenly. Ideally, just leave homeless people alone, they have enough problems. But I can't say "Never bunnyhop a bum," because we did it, once in a while, back in the 80's. So I'd be a hypocrite to tell riders to never do it if you're hauling ass down a street and there's a person passed out on the sidewalk. But now you know there's an official name for it, the bummyhop.
One more thought about homelessness in general, as someone who understands it far more than I ever wanted to.
Monday, April 15, 2019
2-Hip Brooklyn Banks 1989: Part 1
The Brooklyn Banks were already legendary in the skateboard world when Ron Wilkerson decided to hold a contest there in 1989. To get a go idea of what this place actually looked like, here's a video of Scotty Cranmer (pre-accident) and Ruben Alcantara, 15 to 18 years after the Meet the Street contest there, tearing the place up. This is farther back under the Manhattan end of the Brooklyn Bridge, maybe 30-40 yards from where the 1989 contest was held.
The Brooklyn Banks were the de facto skatepark for all of New York City at a time when there were no skateparks in NYC. The banks were made long ago, laid by brick layers of incredible skill. They're all brick, but SMOOTH. They start small and mellow near where the road on the bridge meets the ground level. As you go back farther under the bridge, the banks got higher and higher. There were support columns rising vertically out of the banks, which made for places to do small wall rides or skate wallies. It's one of the most epic environments to ride skateboards or bikes, anywhere, that wasn't designed for skateboards or bikes.
I was one of the few lucky guys who actually got paid to go to Ron Wilkerson's 2-Hip Meet the Street contest there in the fall of 1989. I'm going to tell that story over a series of posts on the new Block Bikes Blog. Follow this link to check out part 1.
I have a new blog going, it's about building an art or creative business, or any small business. You can check it out here:
WPOS Kreative Ideas
Monday, December 31, 2018
Left out of my zines: Pete Augustin
If you were a BMX freestyler in the 80's, and someone mentioned the name Pete Augustin, riding like what's in this clip is probably what comes to mind. In the Webster's Dictionary of Freestyle in the 1980's, if you looked up "aggro," there was a picture of Pete riding street. Remember that pic of him doing a lookback off a curb with the back tire tagging a the top of trash can? Yeah. Hard. Tough. Brash. San Diego street riding. That was Pete Augustin.
So it may surprise some people that, for some reason I can't really remember, Pete Augustin came up to The Spot in Redondo Beach once in a while and had some flatland sessions with us in 1986. Pete was Chris Day's favorite rider, and the guy Chris wanted to emulate back then, and I think Pete hooked Chris up with Bad Boy Club clothes, so maybe that's why he came up to The Spot. In any case, Pete was one of the first SoCal pros I rode with. I think R.L. was out on a tour when I first started at Wizard, and Pete was at The Spot a few times before R.L. got back. He wasn't a huge flatland rider, but you pretty much had to ride flatland then, street wasn't its own genre yet, and Pete had some cool stuff. The rolling backwards handstands were crazy. Here's Pete on flat.
Sliders and backwards wheelies were big in late 1986, and two of my favorite tricks. Pete (and Lew) ripped both at those. I could do a halfway decent backwards wheelie (on the peg), but Pete was doing one handed ones. I thought, "Damn, I need to step my shit up," and started learning those. Lew already did solid one handed backwards wheelies. But Pete also did one handed backwards wheelies, then would grab the front tire, and then let go and just hold the tire for a few seconds. It took me months to get that variation dialed, it was just a weird balance point to keep. That's the big thing I remember from riding with Pete Augustin at The Spot in late 1986.
Even then, Pete had the reputation of being a guy people were afraid to talk to. Everyone who didn't know him seemed to think that if you looked at him wrong, he'd punch you in the face. Maybe he went off on some annoying kid at some point, and it got blown up, out of proportion. But when I was riding with him at The Spot in those days, he was totally cool. OK, he's not like Mr. Congeniality, the smooth-talking salesman type. He would ride, we would ride, and we'd all be doing our own thing for a while. Focused more than anything. But when we started talking, he was cool.
So for the next three or four years, when riders from different parts of the country brought up this idea that Pete Augustin was totally unapproachable, I'd tell them he had always been cool to me, and while he was aggro as hell in his riding, he was cool to talk to.
A couple years later, at one of the local AFA comps in Anaheim, which were held at the R.G. Canning car shows, we had this brick patio area at the Anaheim convention center to practice in. Wall rides were the new thing then, and a few of us were trying them on the brick wall of the patio. Really, we were doing wall slides. We'd bunnyhop next to the wall, and get both tires to touch the wall, sort of sliding against it. Nobody was getting any real traction on the wall. It was just flat horizontal ground to flat vertical wall, no bank to help us out. We were all running 90 or more psi for flatland, which didn't help.
As we were doing that, Pete Augustin rolled out onto the patio. We all did a couple of more lame wall slides. Then Pete went to do one. He did this gargantuan bunnyhop, hitting the wall nearly vertical, slamming the bottoms of his tires into the wall. From flat ground, he bunnhopped into the wall, actually rode up it a bit, and pretty much did a kickturn on the wall, pulled out, and landed. It was fucking amazing. I'd never seen anyone stick to a wall like that coming off of flat ground. Neither had the rest of the guys there. Pete kind of smiled and rode away. I don't think he even said anything. The riding said it all. "Like this, guys. San Diego motherfuckers!"
When writing the stories for my two 48 page zines about The Spot in Redondo, I wrote a few pages about the guys who weren't really locals when I was there, but rode with us now and then. As I cut the sections down to actually fit in the zines, that part got cut. The part about Pete Augustin isn't in the zines, so I decided to write a blog post about riding with him.
Four years later, shooting video for my first, completely self-produced video, Jess Dyrenforth invited me to a session at Mouse's ramp near San Diego, and Pete and Chris Day were there tearing it up, along with underground SoCal legend Mike Tokemoto. You can see that section here at 38:05. Pete's in the white T-shirt. This section is the first serious spine ramp session EVER in a BMX freestyle video, so they were breaking new ground then. So that's what I remember of Pete Augustin from the 1980's.
My zine about the The Spot in Redondo turned into two, solid, 48 page zines of stories and thoughts and photos. The two big, fat zines, come with some original, homemade stickers and mini flyers. We all know that zines immediately turn into collector's items, by their very nature. They're so collectible, nobody ever sells their zines. So I'm charging $15 for these 2-zine packs. Each one is signed and numbered, you know, so you can sell it on Ebay if I ever hit the big time as a writer, like J.K. Rowling or something. Or even Ed Templeton, his "Teens Smoking" books have sold for $500 on Ebay, believe that or not.
Anyhow, if you'd like to add these to your own collection, paypal me $15 to stevenemig13@gmail.com . ("steven" not "steve") Shipping is included in the continental U.S.. If you're in Canada, Alaska, or Hawaii, it's $20. In Australia, New Zealand or the U.K., $25 U.S. You've read the blog, now get my stories into your hot little hands. Or big hands. The first packs are shipping out today.
I've got a new blog going, it's about building an art or creative business, or any small business. You can check it out here:
WPOS Kreative Ideas
Kieran Woolley's "Opera" segment
I never heard of him before today, which doesn't mean much. But this is a really cool skate segment, so check it out. I do most of my...
-
This is the BMX Plus! video, Freestyle's Raddest Tricks , the first video I bought, shortly after moving to San Jose, CA in September o...
-
In 1984, the year BMX freestyle broke from the underground as a weird little sport, a construction worker from Arizona that we'd never ...
-
I met Chad from Powers Bikes right after landing in Richmond last August, and both he, and old friend/FBM founder Steve Crandall, have real...




